When an FK constraint is created, it needs the index on the referenced
table to exist and be valid. When doing parallel pg_restore and the
referenced table was partitioned, this condition can sometimes not be
met, because pg_dump didn't emit sufficient object dependencies to
ensure so; this means that parallel pg_restore would fail in certain
conditions. Fix by having pg_dump make the FK constraint object
dependent on the partition attachment objects for the constraint's
referenced index.
This has been broken since f56f8f8da6, so backpatch to Postgres 12.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191005224333.GA9738@alvherre.pgsql
Otherwise it can be hard to see where an error is coming from, when
the parallel worker sets all the GUCs that it received from the
leader. Bug #15726. Back-patch to 9.5, where RestoreGUCState()
appeared.
Reported-by: Tiago Anastacio
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15726-6d67e4fa14f027b3%40postgresql.org
Commits 801c2dc7 and 801c2dc7 made it possible for vacuum to
try to freeze a multixact that is still running. That was
prevented by a check, but raised an error. Repair.
Back-patch all the way.
Author: Nathan Bossart, Jeremy Schneider
Reported-by: Jeremy Schneider
Reviewed-by: Jim Nasby, Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DAFB8AFF-2F05-4E33-AD7F-FF8B0F760C17%40amazon.com
A race condition can make us try to dereference a NULL pointer to the
PGPROC struct of a process that's already finished. That results in
crashes during REINDEX CONCURRENTLY and CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
This was introduced in ab0dfc961b, so backpatch to pg12.
Reported by: Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191012004446.GT10470@telsasoft.com
The pg_upgrade check for pg_catalog.unknown type when upgrading from 9.6
had a couple of issues with domains and composite types - it detected
even composite types unused in objects with storage. So for example this
was enough to trigger an unnecessary pg_upgrade failure:
CREATE TYPE unknown_composite AS (u pg_catalog.unknown)
On the other hand, this only happened with composite types directly on
the pg_catalog.unknown data type, but not with a domain. So this was not
detected
CREATE DOMAIN unknown_domain AS pg_catalog.unknown;
CREATE TYPE unknown_composite_2 AS (u unknown_domain);
unlike the first example. These false positives and inconsistencies are
unfortunate, but what's worse we've failed to detected objects using the
pg_catalog.unknown type through a domain. So we missed cases like this
CREATE TABLE t (u unknown_composite_2);
The consequence is clusters broken after a pg_upgrade.
This fixes these false positives and false negatives by using the same
recursive CTE introduced by eaf900e842 for sql_identifier. Backpatch all
the way to 10, where the of pg_catalog.unknown data type was restricted.
Author: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-to: 10-
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16045-673e8fa6b5ace196%40postgresql.org
The pg_upgrade check for pg_catalog.line data type when upgrading from
9.3 had a couple of issues with domains and composite types. Firstly, it
triggered false positives for composite types unused in objects with
storage. This was enough to trigger an unnecessary pg_upgrade failure:
CREATE TYPE line_composite AS (l pg_catalog.line)
On the other hand, this only happened with composite types directly on
the pg_catalog.line data type, but not with a domain. So this was not
detected
CREATE DOMAIN line_domain AS pg_catalog.line;
CREATE TYPE line_composite_2 AS (l line_domain);
unlike the first example. These false positives and inconsistencies are
unfortunate, but what's worse we've failed to detected objects using the
pg_catalog.line data type through a domain. So we missed cases like this
CREATE TABLE t (l line_composite_2);
The consequence is clusters broken after a pg_upgrade.
This fixes these false positives and false negatives by using the same
recursive CTE introduced by eaf900e842 for sql_identifier. 9.3 did not
support domains on composite types, but we can still have multi-level
composite types.
Backpatch all the way to 9.4, where the format for pg_catalog.line data
type changed.
Author: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-to: 9.4-
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16045-673e8fa6b5ace196%40postgresql.org
The test in 93765bd956 added an event trigger to ensure that the
tested table rewrites do not get optimized away (as happened in the
past). But doing so would require running the tests in isolation, as
otherwise the trigger might also fire in concurrent sessions, causing
test failures there.
Reported-By: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3328.1570740683@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: 12, just as 93765bd956
Using glibc's version string to detect potential collation definition
changes is not 100% reliable, but it's better than nothing. Currently
this affects only collations explicitly provided by "libc". More work
will be needed to handle the default collation.
Author: Thomas Munro, based on a suggestion from Christoph Berg
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4b76c6d4-ae5e-0dc6-7d0d-b5c796a07e34%402ndquadrant.com
This fixes multiple areas of the documentation:
- COPY for its past compatibility section.
- SET ROLE mentioning INHERITS instead of INHERIT
- PREPARE referring to stmt_name, that is not present.
- Extension documentation about format name with upgrade scripts.
Backpatch down to 9.4 for the relevant parts.
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bf95233a-9943-b341-e2ff-a860c28af481@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Since the introduction of different slot types, in 1a0586de36, we
create a virtual slot in tuplesort_begin_cluster(). While that looks
right, it unfortunately doesn't actually work, as ExecStoreHeapTuple()
is used to store tuples in the slot. Unfortunately no regression tests
for CLUSTER on expression indexes existed so far.
Fix the slot type, and add bare bones tests for CLUSTER on expression
indexes.
Reported-By: Justin Pryzby
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191011210320.GS10470@telsasoft.com
Backpatch: 12, like 1a0586de36
Commit 7c15cef86d changed sql_identifier data type to be based on name
instead of varchar. Unfortunately, this breaks on-disk format for this
data type. Luckily, that should be a very rare problem, as this data
type is used only in information_schema views, so this only affects user
objects (tables, materialized views and indexes). One way to end in
such situation is to do CTAS with a query on those system views.
There are two options to deal with this - we can either abort pg_upgrade
if there are user objects with sql_identifier columns in pg_upgrade, or
we could replace the sql_identifier type with varchar. Considering how
rare the issue is expected to be, and the complexity of replacing the
data type (e.g. in matviews), we've decided to go with the simple check.
The query is somewhat complex - the sql_identifier data type may be used
indirectly - through a domain, a composite type or both, possibly in
multiple levels. Detecting this requires a recursive CTE.
Backpatch to 12, where the sql_identifier definition changed.
Reported-by: Hans Buschmann
Author: Tomas Vondra
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Backpatch-to: 12
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16045-673e8fa6b5ace196%40postgresql.org
1df5875 has changed the way dependencies are dropped for this command
with inheritance trees, which impacts sepgsql. This just updates the
regression test output to take care of the failures and adapt to the new
code.
Reported by buildfarm member rhinoceros.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191013101331.GC1434@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 12
POSIX sigaction(2) can be told to block a set of signals while a
signal handler executes. Make use of that instead of manually
blocking and unblocking signals in the postmaster's signal handlers.
This should save a few cycles, and it also prevents recursive
invocation of signal handlers when many signals arrive in close
succession. We have seen buildfarm failures that seem to be due to
postmaster stack overflow caused by such recursion (exacerbated by
a Linux PPC64 kernel bug).
This doesn't change anything about the way that it works on Windows.
Somebody might consider adjusting port/win32/signal.c to let it work
similarly, but I'm not in a position to do that.
For the moment, just apply to HEAD. Possibly we should consider
back-patching this, but it'd be good to let it age awhile first.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14878.1570820201@sss.pgh.pa.us
When dropping a column on a partitioned table which has one or more
partitioned indexes, the operation was failing as dependencies with
partitioned indexes using the column dropped were not getting removed in
a way consistent with the columns involved across all the relations part
of an inheritance tree.
This commit refactors the code executing column drop so as all the
columns from an inheritance tree to remove are gathered first, and
dropped all at the end. This way, we let the dependency machinery sort
out by itself the deletion of all the columns with the partitioned
indexes across a partition tree.
This issue has been introduced by 1d92a0c, so backpatch down to
REL_12_STABLE.
Author: Amit Langote, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Ashutosh Sharma
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqE9kuBsZ3b5pob2-cvE8ofzPWs-og+g8bKKGnu6b4-yTQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
Within the context of SCRAM, "verifier" has a specific meaning in the
protocol, per RFCs. The existing code used "verifier" differently, to
mean whatever is or would be stored in pg_auth.rolpassword.
Fix this by using the term "secret" for this, following RFC 5803.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/be397b06-6e4b-ba71-c7fb-54cae84a7e18%402ndquadrant.com
With xlc v16.1.0, it causes internal compiler errors. With xlc versions
not exhibiting that bug, removing -qsrcmsg merely changes the compiler
error reporting format. Back-patch to 9.4 (all supported versions).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191003064105.GA3955242@rfd.leadboat.com
In v11 or before, those settings could not take effect in crash recovery
because they are specified in recovery.conf and crash recovery always
starts without recovery.conf. But commit 2dedf4d9a8 integrated
recovery.conf into postgresql.conf and which unexpectedly allowed
those settings to take effect even in crash recovery. This is definitely
not good behavior.
To fix the issue, this commit makes crash recovery always ignore
restore_command and recovery_end_command settings.
Back-patch to v12 where the issue was added.
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e445616d-023e-a268-8aa1-67b8b335340c@pgmasters.net
This reverts commit f7ab80285. Per discussion, we can't remove an
exported symbol without a SONAME bump, which we don't want to do.
In particular that breaks usage of current libpq.so with pre-9.3
versions of psql etc, which need libpq to export pqsignal().
As noted in that commit message, exporting the symbol from libpgport.a
won't work reliably; but actually we don't want to export src/port's
implementation anyway. Any pre-9.3 client is going to be expecting the
definition that pqsignal() had before 9.3, which was that it didn't
set SA_RESTART for SIGALRM. Hence, put back pqsignal() in a separate
source file in src/interfaces/libpq, and give it the old semantics.
Back-patch to v12.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1g5vmT-0003K1-6S@gemulon.postgresql.org
In c2fe139c20 I made ATRewriteTable() use tuple slots. Unfortunately
I did not notice that columns can be added in a rewrite that do not
have a default, when another column is added/altered requiring one.
Initialize columns to NULL again, and add tests.
Bug: #16038
Reported-By: anonymous
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16038-5c974541f2bf6749@postgresql.org
Backpatch: 12, where the bug was introduced in c2fe139c20
The file descriptor was opened with read-only to fsync a regular file,
which would cause EBADFD errors on some platforms.
This is similar to the recent fix done by a586cc4b (which was broken by
me with 82a5649), except that I noticed this issue while monitoring the
backend code for similar mistakes. Backpatch to 9.4, as this has been
introduced since logical decoding exists as of b89e151.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191006045548.GA14532@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Previously, the "Database:" label in the error file was unclear if the
label was a status report or the problem was _in_ the database. New
text is "In database:".
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191002172337.GC9680@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: head
Previously, our docs would say "Specifies the number of milliseconds"
but it wasn't clear that "milliseconds" was merely the default unit.
New text says "Specifies duration (defaults to milliseconds)", which is
clearer.
Reported-by: basil.bourque@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15912-2e35e9026f61230b@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12
As of d9dd406fe2, we require MSVC 2013,
which means _MSC_VER >= 1800. This means that conditionals about
older versions of _MSC_VER can be removed or simplified.
Previous code was also in some cases handling MinGW, where _MSC_VER is
not defined at all, incorrectly, such as in pg_ctl.c and win32_port.h,
leading to some compiler warnings. This should now be handled better.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
This includes new TAP tests for a couple of areas not covered yet and
some improvements:
- More coverage for --no-ensure-shutdown, the enforced recovery step and
--dry-run.
- Failures with option combinations and basic option checks.
- Removal of a duplicated comment.
Author: Alexey Kondratov, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191007010651.GD14532@paquier.xyz
The postmaster's code path for spawning a bgworker neglected to check
whether we already have the max number of live child processes. That's
a bit hard to hit, since it would necessarily be a transient condition;
but if we do, AssignPostmasterChildSlot() fails causing a postmaster
crash, as seen in a report from Bhargav Kamineni.
To fix, invoke canAcceptConnections() in the bgworker code path, as we
do in the other code paths that spawn children. Since we don't want
the same pmState tests in this case, add a child-process-type parameter
to canAcceptConnections() so that it can know what to do.
Back-patch to 9.5. In principle the same hazard exists in 9.4, but the
code is enough different that this patch wouldn't quite fix it there.
Given the tiny usage of bgworkers in that branch it doesn't seem worth
creating a variant patch for it.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18733.1570382257@sss.pgh.pa.us
Temporarily change pg_ctl so that the postmaster's exit status will
be printed (to the postmaster's stdout). This is to help identify
the cause of intermittent "postmaster exited during a parallel
transaction" failures seen on a couple of buildfarm members. This
change degrades pg_ctl's functionality in a couple of minor ways,
so we'll revert it once we've obtained the desired info.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18537.1570421268@sss.pgh.pa.us
This includes a couple of changes around the new behavior of pg_rewind
which enforces recovery to happen once on a cluster not shut down
cleanly:
- Some comments and documentation improvements.
- Shutdown the cluster to rewind with immediate mode in all the tests,
this allows to check after the forced recovery behavior which is wanted
as new default.
- Use -F for the forced recovery step, so as postgres does not use
fsync. This was useless as a final sync is done once the tool is done.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kondratov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191004083721.GA1829@paquier.xyz
Commit aa087ec64 was a bit over-hasty about the doc changes needed
while splitting pg_statistic_ext_data off from pg_statistic_ext.
It duplicated one para and inserted another in what seems to me
to be the wrong section. Fix that up, and in passing do some minor
copy-editing.
Per report from noborusai.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAM3qnLXLUz4mOBkqa8jxigpKhKNxzSuvwpjvCRPvO5EqWjxSg@mail.gmail.com
Commit 1cff1b95a included some code that supposed it could repalloc()
a memory chunk to a smaller size without risk of the chunk moving.
That was not a great idea, because it depended on undocumented behavior
of AllocSetRealloc, which commit c477f3e44 changed thereby breaking it.
(Not to mention that this code ought to work with other memory context
types, which might not work the same...) So get rid of the repalloc
calls, and instead just wipe the now-unused ListCell array and/or tell
Valgrind it's NOACCESS, as if we'd freed it.
In cases where the initial list allocation had been quite large, this
could represent an annoying waste of space. In principle we could
ameliorate that by allocating the initial cell array separately when
it exceeds some threshold. But that would complicate new_list() which
is hot code, and the returns would materialize only in narrow cases.
On balance I don't think it'd be worth it.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17059.1570208426@sss.pgh.pa.us
This prints the unexpected value in more failure cases, and it removes
forty-eight hand-maintained error messages. Back-patch to 9.5, which
introduced these tests.
Reviewed (in an earlier version) by Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190915160021.GA24376@alvherre.pgsql
This would be all right, maybe, if it didn't also match a file that
definitely should not be ignored. We don't add rmgrs so often that
manual maintenance of this file list is impractical, so just write
out the list.
(I find the equivalent wildcard use in the Makefile pretty lazy and
unsafe as well, but will leave that alone until it actually causes a
problem.)
Per bug #16042 from Denis Stuchalin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16042-c174ee692ac21cbd@postgresql.org
One of the upsert related tests is unstable (sometimes even hanging
until isolationtester's step timeout is reached). Based on preliminary
analysis that might be a problem outside of just that test, but not
really related to EPQ and triggers. Disable for now, to get the
buildfarm greener again.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191004222437.45qmglpto43pd3jb@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 9.6-, just like c884119950.
Alvaro Herrera