via extended query protocol, because it sends Sync right after Execute
without realizing that the command to be executed is COPY. There seems
to be no reasonable way for it to realize that, either, so the best fix
seems to be to make the backend ignore Sync during copy-in mode. Bit of
a wart on the protocol, but little alternative. Also, libpq must send
another Sync after terminating the COPY, if the command was issued via
Execute.
libpq users to perform Bind/Execute of previously prepared statements.
Per yesterday's discussion, this offers enough performance improvement
to justify bending the 'no new features during beta' rule.
just before CommitTransactionCommand(). This is a more sensible place
to put it since commit discards a lot of contexts, and we'd not find
out about stomps affecting only transaction-local contexts.
tree. This also catches lots of little Makefile bugs, so here's a small
patch for one of them (replacing an explicit reference to thread.c with
a reference to it as the first prerequsite of the rule makes make look
for it in the place where it was found (the source tree) rather than in
the build tree. (using GNU make 3.79.1)
John Gray
target columns in INSERT and UPDATE targetlists. Don't rely on resname
to be accurate in ruleutils, either. This fixes bug reported by
Donald Fraser, in which renaming a column referenced in a rule did not
work very well.
of transaction isolation level changed from uppercase to lower case between 7.3 and 7.4. In testing, a regression was also fixed in this area when talking to
a 7.2 server due to changes in how notice messages are processed in the current
code.
Modified Files:
jdbc/build.xml jdbc/org/postgresql/core/BaseStatement.java
jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/AbstractJdbc1Connection.java
yet, though). Avoid using nth() to fetch tlist entries; provide a
common routine get_tle_by_resno() to search a tlist for a particular
resno. This replaces a couple uses of nth() and a dozen hand-coded
search loops. Also, replace a few uses of nth(length-1, list) with
llast().
index pages: when _bt_getbuf asks the FSM for a free index page, it is
possible (and, in some cases, even moderately likely) that the answer
will be the same page that _bt_split is trying to split. _bt_getbuf
already knew that the returned page might not be free, but it wasn't
prepared for the possibility that even trying to lock the page could
be problematic. Fix by doing a conditional rather than unconditional
grab of the page lock.
Bruce Momjian