As of d9dd406fe2, we require MSVC 2013,
which means _MSC_VER >= 1800. This means that conditionals about
older versions of _MSC_VER can be removed or simplified.
Previous code was also in some cases handling MinGW, where _MSC_VER is
not defined at all, incorrectly, such as in pg_ctl.c and win32_port.h,
leading to some compiler warnings. This should now be handled better.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
nan_test.pgc supposed that it could unconditionally #define isnan()
and isinf() on WIN32. This was evidently copied at some point from
src/include/port/win32.h, but nowadays there's a test on _MSC_VER
there. Make nan_test.pgc look the same.
Per buildfarm warnings. There's no evidence this produces anything
worse than a warning, and besides it's only a test case, so I don't
feel a need to back-patch.
To ensure that "make installcheck" can be used safely against an existing
installation, we need to be careful about what global object names
(database, role, and tablespace names) we use; otherwise we might
accidentally clobber important objects. There's been a weak consensus that
test databases should have names including "regression", and that test role
names should start with "regress_", but we didn't have any particular rule
about tablespace names; and neither of the other rules was followed with
any consistency either.
This commit moves us a long way towards having a hard-and-fast rule that
regression test databases must have names including "regression", and that
test role and tablespace names must start with "regress_". It's not
completely there because I did not touch some test cases in rolenames.sql
that test creation of special role names like "session_user". That will
require some rethinking of exactly what we want to test, whereas the intent
of this patch is just to hit all the cases in which the needed renamings
are cosmetic.
There is no enforcement mechanism in this patch either, but if we don't
add one we can expect that the tests will soon be violating the convention
again. Again, that's not such a cosmetic change and it will require
discussion. (But I did use a quick-hack enforcement patch to find these
cases.)
Discussion: <16638.1468620817@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Split the rather long ecpg_execute() function into ecpg_build_params(),
ecpg_autostart_transaction(), a smaller ecpg_execute() and
ecpg_process_output(). There is no user-visible change here, only code
reorganization to support future patches.
Author: Zoltán Böszörményi
Reviewed by Antonin Houska. Larger, older versions of this patch were
reviewed by Noah Misch and Michael Meskes.
This splits ECPGdo() into ecpg_prologue(), ecpg_do() and
ecpg_epilogue(), and renames free_params() into ecpg_free_params() and
exports it. This makes it possible for future code to use these
routines for their own purposes.
There is no user-visible functionality change here, only code
reorganization.
Zoltán Böszörményi
Reviewed by Antonin Houska. Larger, older versions of this patch were
reviewed by Noah Misch and Michael Meskes.
Peter Eisentraut