Fix confusion about the return rowtype of SQL-language procedures.

There is a very ancient hack in check_sql_fn_retval that allows a
single SELECT targetlist entry of composite type to be taken as
supplying all the output columns of a function returning composite.
(This is grotty and fundamentally ambiguous, but it's really hard
to do nested composite-returning functions without it.)

As far as I know, that doesn't cause any problems in ordinary
functions.  It's disastrous for procedures however.  All procedures
that have any output parameters are labeled with prorettype RECORD,
and the CALL code expects it will get back a record with one column
per output parameter, regardless of whether any of those parameters
is composite.  Doing something else leads to an assertion failure
or core dump.

This is simple enough to fix: we just need to not apply that rule
when considering procedures.  However, that requires adding another
argument to check_sql_fn_retval, which at least in principle might be
getting called by external callers.  Therefore, in the back branches
convert check_sql_fn_retval into an ABI-preserving wrapper around a
new function check_sql_fn_retval_ext.

Per report from Yahor Yuzefovich.  This has been broken since we
implemented procedures, so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABz5gWHSjj2df6uG0NRiDhZ_Uz=Y8t0FJP-_SVSsRsnrQT76Gg@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane 2024-03-12 18:16:10 -04:00
parent fe4750effd
commit 6ee3261e9b
6 changed files with 36 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -959,6 +959,7 @@ fmgr_sql_validator(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
(void) check_sql_fn_retval(querytree_list,
rettype, rettupdesc,
proc->prokind,
false, NULL);
}

View File

@ -746,6 +746,7 @@ init_sql_fcache(FunctionCallInfo fcinfo, Oid collation, bool lazyEvalOK)
fcache->returnsTuple = check_sql_fn_retval(queryTree_list,
rettype,
rettupdesc,
procedureStruct->prokind,
false,
&resulttlist);
@ -1606,6 +1607,7 @@ check_sql_fn_statements(List *queryTreeLists)
bool
check_sql_fn_retval(List *queryTreeLists,
Oid rettype, TupleDesc rettupdesc,
char prokind,
bool insertDroppedCols,
List **resultTargetList)
{
@ -1625,7 +1627,7 @@ check_sql_fn_retval(List *queryTreeLists,
/*
* If it's declared to return VOID, we don't care what's in the function.
* (This takes care of the procedure case, as well.)
* (This takes care of procedures with no output parameters, as well.)
*/
if (rettype == VOIDOID)
return false;
@ -1780,8 +1782,13 @@ check_sql_fn_retval(List *queryTreeLists,
* or not the record type really matches. For the moment we rely on
* runtime type checking to catch any discrepancy, but it'd be nice to
* do better at parse time.
*
* We must *not* do this for a procedure, however. Procedures with
* output parameter(s) have rettype RECORD, and the CALL code expects
* to get results corresponding to the list of output parameters, even
* when there's just one parameter that's composite.
*/
if (tlistlen == 1)
if (tlistlen == 1 && prokind != PROKIND_PROCEDURE)
{
TargetEntry *tle = (TargetEntry *) linitial(tlist);

View File

@ -4707,6 +4707,7 @@ inline_function(Oid funcid, Oid result_type, Oid result_collid,
querytree_list = list_make1(querytree);
if (check_sql_fn_retval(list_make1(querytree_list),
result_type, rettupdesc,
funcform->prokind,
false, NULL))
goto fail; /* reject whole-tuple-result cases */
@ -5253,6 +5254,7 @@ inline_set_returning_function(PlannerInfo *root, RangeTblEntry *rte)
*/
if (!check_sql_fn_retval(list_make1(querytree_list),
fexpr->funcresulttype, rettupdesc,
funcform->prokind,
true, NULL) &&
(functypclass == TYPEFUNC_COMPOSITE ||
functypclass == TYPEFUNC_COMPOSITE_DOMAIN ||

View File

@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ extern void check_sql_fn_statements(List *queryTreeLists);
extern bool check_sql_fn_retval(List *queryTreeLists,
Oid rettype, TupleDesc rettupdesc,
char prokind,
bool insertDroppedCols,
List **resultTargetList);

View File

@ -148,7 +148,19 @@ CALL ptest4a(a, b); -- error, not supported
$$;
ERROR: calling procedures with output arguments is not supported in SQL functions
CONTEXT: SQL function "ptest4b"
DROP PROCEDURE ptest4a;
-- we used to get confused by a single output argument that is composite
CREATE PROCEDURE ptest4c(INOUT comp int8_tbl)
LANGUAGE SQL
AS $$
SELECT ROW(1, 2);
$$;
CALL ptest4c(NULL);
comp
-------
(1,2)
(1 row)
DROP PROCEDURE ptest4a, ptest4c;
-- named and default parameters
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE ptest5(a int, b text, c int default 100)
LANGUAGE SQL

View File

@ -90,7 +90,16 @@ AS $$
CALL ptest4a(a, b); -- error, not supported
$$;
DROP PROCEDURE ptest4a;
-- we used to get confused by a single output argument that is composite
CREATE PROCEDURE ptest4c(INOUT comp int8_tbl)
LANGUAGE SQL
AS $$
SELECT ROW(1, 2);
$$;
CALL ptest4c(NULL);
DROP PROCEDURE ptest4a, ptest4c;
-- named and default parameters