opensourcemirror
/
postgresql
mirror of git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Reset evaluation plan tuple table next free slot counter to 0 

after ExecEndNode. It must be done! Or we'll be out of free
tuple slots very soon, though slots are freed by ExecEndNode
and ready for reusing.

We didn't see this problem before because of

int         nSlots = ExecCountSlotsNode(plan);
TupleTable  tupleTable = ExecCreateTupleTable(nSlots + 10);
    /* why add ten? - jolly */

code in InitPlan - i.e. extra 10 slots. Simple select uses
3 slots and so it was possible to re-use evaluation plan
3 additional times and didn't get

elog(NOTICE, "Plan requires more slots than are available");
elog(ERROR, "send mail to your local executor guru to fix this");

Changes are obvious and shouldn't be problems with them.
Though, I added Assert(epqstate->es_tupleTable->next == 0)
before EvalPlanQual():ExecInitNode and we'll notice if
something is still wrong. Is it better to change Assert
to elog(ERROR) ?
This commit is contained in:
Vadim B. Mikheev 1999-06-09 12:23:42 +00:00
parent 0e41fd57df
commit 51298bcfda
1 changed files with 12 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
src/backend/executor/execMain.c
View File

@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execMain.c,v 1.86 1999/06/06 15:14:40 vadim Exp $
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execMain.c,v 1.87 1999/06/09 12:23:42 vadim Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -1673,6 +1673,7 @@ EvalPlanQual(EState *estate, Index rti, ItemPointer tid)
Assert(oldepq->rti != 0);
/* stop execution */
ExecEndNode(epq->plan, epq->plan);
epqstate->es_tupleTable->next = 0;
pfree(epqstate->es_evTuple[epq->rti - 1]);
epqstate->es_evTuple[epq->rti - 1] = NULL;
/* push current PQ to freePQ stack */
@ -1741,7 +1742,10 @@ EvalPlanQual(EState *estate, Index rti, ItemPointer tid)
* ability to use ExecReScan instead of ExecInitNode, so...
*/
if (endNode)
{
ExecEndNode(epq->plan, epq->plan);
epqstate->es_tupleTable->next = 0;
}
/* free old RTE' tuple */
if (epqstate->es_evTuple[epq->rti - 1] != NULL)
@ -1774,7 +1778,11 @@ EvalPlanQual(EState *estate, Index rti, ItemPointer tid)
TransactionId xwait = SnapshotDirty->xmax;
if (TransactionIdIsValid(SnapshotDirty->xmin))
elog(ERROR, "EvalPlanQual: t_xmin is uncommitted ?!");
{
elog(NOTICE, "EvalPlanQual: t_xmin is uncommitted ?!");
Assert(!TransactionIdIsValid(SnapshotDirty->xmin));
elog(ERROR, "Aborting this transaction");
}
/*
* If tuple is being updated by other transaction then we have
@ -1836,6 +1844,7 @@ EvalPlanQual(EState *estate, Index rti, ItemPointer tid)
estate->es_origPlan->nParamExec * sizeof(ParamExecData));
memset(epqstate->es_evTupleNull, false,
length(estate->es_range_table) * sizeof(bool));
Assert(epqstate->es_tupleTable->next == 0);
ExecInitNode(epq->plan, epqstate, NULL);
/*
@ -1866,6 +1875,7 @@ lpqnext:;
if (TupIsNull(slot))
{
ExecEndNode(epq->plan, epq->plan);
epqstate->es_tupleTable->next = 0;
pfree(epqstate->es_evTuple[epq->rti - 1]);
epqstate->es_evTuple[epq->rti - 1] = NULL;
/* pop old PQ from the stack */